From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311271763 22637 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2011 18:09:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 20:09:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgL-0002rS-SF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:09:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgL-0004U1-98 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgI-0004Ta-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgH-0004Kw-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgH-0004Ks-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjxgF-0005rD-SW; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sam Steingold Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:09:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9132 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9132.131127171022464 (code B ref 9132); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:09:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 18:08:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjxfi-0005qH-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjxfg-0005q4-Rt for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so1092593vxi.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=vLxipbKFaA4P9hliT9QybsLJjitDq5rRY9lExFXKq24=; b=P5wth/qeyk47918TB0RqKzmlsF8G59lp7gXGcWJsWONXlVk2eyMGhSBXld0bxOs7kL BIGhPTX0m3JZ2aDPE7qYSY88lz065KWaPavHjzH7dU/so7GpO560RJHM5+rsb7lsigKS NUluEVt99XRuSdPDm54AZZlUwjVLCr1y4y5SQ= Original-Received: by 10.52.97.8 with SMTP id dw8mr666506vdb.150.1311271703276; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gi16sm534012vcb.25.2011.07.21.11.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:52 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:09:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49518 Archived-At: > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-21 20:17:52 +0300]: > >> From: Sam Steingold >> Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 >> >> > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or >> > does it fail in the same way? >> >> the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l > > And bytecomp.el was given with leading directories or just literally > as "bytecomp.el"? full correct path. > What happens if you invoke Emacs interactively from the > src/oo-spd/i386 directory, then visit latin-ltx.el, and type > "M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile RET", with or without loading > bytecomp.el? works -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://jihadwatch.org http://www.memritv.org http://openvotingconsortium.org http://ffii.org http://palestinefacts.org http://memri.org http://camera.org My name is Deja Vu. Have we met before?