From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Troxel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: hashcash removal from Gnus? does anyone use it? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:19:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k4t3xehn.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269361227 15152 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2010 16:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17860@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 23 17:20:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu6q5-0005Kk-Q5 for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:20:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu6pk-00089e-8G; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu6pi-00089P-6v for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu6ph-0008MK-3Z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from linuxpal.mit.edu ([18.62.1.14]) by quimby with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Nu7ll-00047u-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:19:57 +0100 Original-Received: by linuxpal.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 9545) id 0278E17A6D; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:19:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:100323:ding@gnus.org::/rhvVwV29W9umGOU:00001hJD X-Hashcash: 1:20:100323:tzz@lifelogs.com::/rhvVwV29W9uYopZ:026JU X-Hashcash: 1:20:100323:emacs-devel@gnu.org::/rhvVwV29W9umGOU:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000006cFd In-Reply-To: <87k4t3xehn.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:08:20 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69465 gmane.emacs.devel:122558 Archived-At: --=-=-= Ted Zlatanov writes: > Does anyone actually use hashcash (on the receiver or sender side)? > > It seemed like a good idea years ago but hasn't taken off. Maybe it > shouldn't be so entwined with message.el and Gnus in general. People > can still set it up individually from gnus/contrib. I include hashcash on outgoing mail, and have spamassassin give negative points to incoming mail with hashcash tokens. Are you asking if hashcash should not be generated by default, or if support should be removed? Making it non default seems reasonable, but removing it seems unwarranted unless its presence is causing a maintenance hassle. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuo6iYACgkQH9p66AmO1g5t7wCfUZ0ClUo2gl8NVtYVmIe/Mujs zgMAn0xST/rYcA8XIhrDLw3JqpPQMZfE =l9aF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--