From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:20:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4DF726E0.6020205@gmx.at> <4DF79707.7000707@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308074673 13326 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2011 18:04:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8857@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 20:04:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXyW-0000Hz-ND for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:04:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXyV-0002UY-AJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXIW-0000Vr-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXIU-0002HL-Th for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXIU-0002H5-FZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXIT-0000gK-TC; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8857 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8857-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8857.13080720202562 (code B ref 8857); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8857) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2011 17:20:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXHn-0000fG-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXHm-0000f5-I0 for 8857@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51371) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWXHg-0000Wi-DA; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:20:12 -0400 X-Spook: freedom monarchist RSA SRI PET number key Soviet Rumsfeld X-Ran: Ll]fu}];zVP5\dUnZV@;9pp#y;/,X!]1KQ%#'4}boCMi@5Y7-oTOfRy]4hPg=mCzl`^|r+ X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4DF79707.7000707@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:14:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47143 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > But I wonder why this wasn't a problem before (that is, the idea of > popping up a new frame). I guess because pop-up-frames defaults to nil in Emacs 23. But in the trunk, a default Emacs may now pop-up a frame if it thinks it necessary.