From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorgen Grahn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions? Date: 11 Feb 2010 10:35:35 GMT Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265884913 15397 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2010 10:41:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:53 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 11:41:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfWUU-0001PR-Lv for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:41:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfWUR-0005iN-2y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:41:43 -0500 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Trace: individual.net iRfyWCFFQ4bnpsT6bbKIRAAHD8c/ry1c6fNkBrfUrY0C9xUiYe Cancel-Lock: sha1:vf3f8PsLRsZNb1Vy4PvQQ41A9Oc= User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:176725 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:71796 Archived-At: On Mon, 2010-02-08, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> So you're implying that Emacs 23 fixes exactly that, or that it >> reworks the buffer selection interface completely? > > I revamped the minibuffer completion code in Emacs-23, and along the way > someone installed a patch that provides just the feature you're > asking for. > >> Actually I still use Emacs 21. Emacs 22 is also available as part of >> Debian Linux, but I gain more by sticking to 21, which is the one >> available at work (semi-officially available -- officially we are >> stuck with 20). > > Emacs-23 is also available in Debian (at least in Debian testing). I'm sure it is, but I'm a Debian "stable" kind of guy. >> So, this annoyance of mine isn't so important that I'm willing to >> upgrade to Emacs 23 everywhere just yet. > > As long as you're a happy Emacs user, I indeed am. I don't see myself switching to anything else, ever. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn O o .