From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joost Kremers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: My emacs was upgraded and I am a novice again Date: 23 Sep 2007 18:03:09 GMT Message-ID: References: <46F2BA57.3060604@gmail.com> <711a73df0709212204r65af300cr37aab355f244176e@mail.gmail.com> <853ax5nx23.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190572841 26003 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2007 18:40:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:41 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 23 20:40:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZWNe-0007Mt-S6 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:40:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZWNc-0001fz-6e for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:40:32 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Trace: individual.net oh49CSpuCFfSAxV6YjdgoQkaVGGqeuvtnLAKS96hHRNzMndn57 Cancel-Lock: sha1:RuHy+V18JtflF1ceiOsyO89U/FQ= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Editor: Emacs of course! User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:152271 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:47776 Archived-At: Tom Tromey wrote: > FWIW, I don't think this problem is a major thing. It does mean that > many of Emacs' features probably go under-used. Even with this hand > tied behind its back, it is still better than other editors :-) i don't think emacs is any different in that respect than other large software programs. or do you think that every openoffice.org user knows all the features that suite has to offer? ;-) -- Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht EN:SiS(9)