From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Schone Mullerin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: installing emacs and X11 on OS X Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:17:34 GMT Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035926548 5289 80.91.224.249 (29 Oct 2002 21:22:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 186dof-0001Mx-00 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:22:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186dnf-0001rf-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:21:23 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!paloalto-snr1.gtei.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Darwin) Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Trace: /w3Za/cf9qDa3VzVMiLrhjGzAwp4ji994C6NJQ3Csvg5TbzaTDRmkyXqqu7ZoKSOVMMQ7R0Mn2gx!M7fez+0wSxr4QSyO1cwsj3D6wlSpT22HuIn2poMYY3iuT+aIyBxN6lcffqf4I3R3RqyKsT1Kj/Wa!i5B2 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@gte.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:17:33 GMT Original-Distribution: world Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106530 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3080 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3080 In article , Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> That's why vigorous discussions are healthy (and why the "how dare you >> criticize the developers" attitude is so unhealthy). > > I'm at a loss why did you need to accuse me of such a nasty attitude. I'm sorry, I thought it was clear I was referring to another post from another contributor, one who took me to task for daring to criticize a developer. Look back a couple of days, you'll see it. It is, just as you say, an offensive (and idiotic) attitude. But I didn't mean to suggest it was _your_ attitude. Quite the contrary, I think this discussion has gone very well. Sorry again if the reference was unclear.