From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Eichwalder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: \201 back again Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:16:28 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <7458-Fri20Sep2002192255+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3028-Sat21Sep2002005404+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <7048-Sat21Sep2002180014+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032626877 4182 127.0.0.1 (21 Sep 2002 16:47:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17snQC-00015K-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:47:56 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17so5a-0001yL-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:30:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17snQB-0000CV-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17snNV-00006u-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17snNQ-00006g-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from dns.franken.de ([193.175.24.33] helo=elvis.franken.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17snNP-000054-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17snNO-0001k1-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: by tux.gnu.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 270) id 898DDA4CB3; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:16:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <7048-Sat21Sep2002180014+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> ("Eli Zaretskii"'s message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:00:17 +0300") Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8080 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8080 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > I think the archiving scripts remove that line. The message I received also didn't contain it. You said it were tagged as "utf-8" -- but according to ShengHuo ZHU it was emacs-mule, not UTF-8. Also, please use uppercase letters for UTF-8 inside the MIME headers. > ??? RMAIL should not add such headers, they should be present in the > original message. Sure. I meant the mail composing/sending function. I forgot, RMAIL is for receiving messages only :-( > The same effect can be achieved with RMAIL: see rmail-redecode-body. Good. -- ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): | http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o Free Translation Project: | _-\_<, http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)