From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: take this famous emacs benchmark test Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:47:02 +0200 Organization: CWI, Amsterdam Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050479375 31124 80.91.224.249 (16 Apr 2003 07:49:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 16 09:49:34 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 195hfi-00085r-00 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:49:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 195hf0-0003gn-06 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 195heq-0003US-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 195hel-0003L9-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 195heH-0002rd-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 195heH-0003Kc-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 195heC-0002bD-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from relay.surfnet.nl ([192.87.5.144]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 195hdJ-0001n5-00 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from news.surfnet.nl (news.surfnet.nl [192.87.5.138]) by relay.surfnet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE974352 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:47:03 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by news.surfnet.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id JAA11604 for gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:47:02 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Original-Lines: 37 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: occarina.pna.cwi.nl Original-X-Trace: news.surfnet.nl 1050479222 10988 192.16.184.200 (16 Apr 2003 07:47:02 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.surfnet.nl Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:47:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Dan Jacobson's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:05:12 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ru+azCuo3l5qA1Gmmw2hjkWkBCw= X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4807 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4807 Dan Jacobson writes: > Fellas, take my nifto emacs benchmark test, which I pegged together > just moments ago without proper computer training... > > j=;for i in '' -nw -q --no-site-file;do j=$i\ $j;c="time emacs $j -f > kill-emacs";echo -e \\n\$ $c;$c;done > > ...to see just how much slower your emacs plods along due to your > and your "Linux distribution" crud-encrusting it. Just cut and paste it > into your shell to-day! Results here at Nerdsburg Laboratories: > > $ time emacs -f kill-emacs > 0.97user 0.13system 0:01.30elapsed 84%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1632major+952minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > $ time emacs -nw -f kill-emacs > 0.80user 0.12system 0:00.93elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1305major+823minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > $ time emacs -q -nw -f kill-emacs > 0.44user 0.07system 0:00.53elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1296major+675minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > $ time emacs --no-site-file -q -nw -f kill-emacs > 0.07user 0.03system 0:00.09elapsed 105%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1056major+311minor)pagefaults 0swaps I'm curious. What happens when you do these four tests in reverse order? [...] Lute. -- (spook) => "Skipjack 9705 Samford Road propaganda" (insert-file-contents "~/.signature") => (error "`~/.signature' too rude")