Re: Let's tell we are using GTK+

[Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra@cwi.nl>]

Terje Rosten <terjeros@phys.ntnu.no> writes:

> * Lute Kamstra
> | 
> | Maybe the GTK version should be mentioned as well.
>
> Updated patches with version information and the (annoying?) +
> sign removed. emacs-version will now display something like this:
>
>  GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ 2.2.1) of 2003-08-04 on 
>  myhost.net

I like it, but...

[...]

> +  {
> +    char gtk_version[8];
> +    sprintf (gtk_version, "%d.%d.%d", GTK_MAJOR_VERSION, GTK_MINOR_VERSION,
> +	     GTK_MICRO_VERSION);
> +    Vgtk_version_string = build_string (gtk_version);
> +  }

this seems vulnerable to a buffer overflow.  It is acceptable to use
snprintf instead, or isn't that portable enough?  (I'm not really
intimate with C.)  What could be used instead, a larger string?


  Lute.