From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns209@hardakers.net>
To: Rehan Iftikhar <rehan.iftikhar@gmail.com>
Cc: Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:37:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sdk4bc1vnh.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJsxe3ONdA2y8FfaFVWSHJKAXuz9fO3VR82RJJYKXUrVEVvTGg@mail.gmail.com> (Rehan Iftikhar's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:02:03 -0700")
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:02:03 -0700, Rehan Iftikhar <rehan.iftikhar@gmail.com> said:
RI> Personally I feel that the StackExchange interface is more accessible
RI> to newcomers than mailing lists or Worg. Its a great way to ask a
RI> questions and get an answer.
(and it's worth noting that org-mode questions already get asked on the
existing Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=org )
RI> The mailing list is better at having conversations about a topic. Worg
RI> is a great resource for hand-curated advice, which will always be
RI> useful.
RI> I would definitely use a StackExchange-like application for Org if it existed.
RI> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Memnon Anon
RI> <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Thomas Renkert <tunnelblick@quantentunnel.de> writes:
>>
>>> I noticed that - as more people with a diverse range of background knowledge
>>> start to use orgmode - the mailing list is getting more and more difficult to
>>> navigate:
>>
>> I do agree that the volume of mails did considerably increase.
>>
>>> a lot of threads are long and winding and many of the posts are basic
>>> questions from beginners and questions about special use cases or
>>> scenarios from
>>> more experienced users.
>>
>> At this point, however, I have a different impression.
>> Yes, there are some long threads, but those seem to be rarley those
>> interesting for new users while setting up their orgworld.
>> Those threads are *imho* usually about new features that need
>> discussion, clarification etc.: a ping pong of ideas.
>> When subareas emerge, tags like [BABEL] or now [CALFW] make it easy to
>> parse them out if you are not interested.
>>
>> OTOH, I am used to dealing with mailing lists and I find them very
>> convenient. Others may very well have a different impression.
>> Is this worth a poll in a new thread?
>>
>>> An idea:
>>> Many of you may be familiar with the Q&A-Sites www.stackoverflow.com or
>>> www.superuser.com.
>>
>> There are already some questions about org on stackoverflow, if people
>> are interested in this format, they can already go there. Setting this
>> up seems overkill to me, especially, because we have Worg to collect
>> the nuggets of all threads. If newcomers find the volume on this list
>> overwhelming, I think splitting it into a -dev and a -user list would
>> be the next logical step, first.
>>
>> However, I am not opposed to this idea when others agree it would be
>> usefull. I can't really see myself using it so far, but that may very
>> well change.
>>
>> Memnon
>>
>>
>>
>>
RI> --
RI> -Rehan
--
Wes Hardaker
My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/
My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-20 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 8:10 Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode Thomas Renkert
2011-07-20 9:44 ` Jambunathan K
2011-07-20 12:13 ` Thomas Renkert
2011-07-20 13:53 ` Rainer M Krug
2011-07-20 15:32 ` A. Ryan Reynolds
2011-07-20 15:39 ` John Hendy
2011-07-20 13:45 ` Memnon Anon
2011-07-20 16:02 ` Rehan Iftikhar
2011-07-20 21:37 ` Wes Hardaker [this message]
2011-07-21 9:51 ` Bastien
2011-07-21 10:59 ` Thomas Renkert
2011-07-21 13:58 ` Jason Dunsmore
2011-07-21 14:15 ` suvayu ali
2011-07-21 14:27 ` John Hendy
2011-07-22 9:38 ` Bastien
2011-07-22 12:23 ` Bastien
2011-07-22 12:31 ` Rainer M Krug
2011-07-22 13:27 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sdk4bc1vnh.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net \
--to=wjhns209@hardakers.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com \
--cc=rehan.iftikhar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.