From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emilio Lopes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: small Eshell docfix Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:23:07 +0200 Organization: private Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094070089 8120 80.91.224.253 (1 Sep 2004 20:21:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 22:21:19 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C2bba-0001Js-00 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:21:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2bgX-00073G-5g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2bgK-00071Z-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2bgI-00070S-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2bgI-00070P-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.26.116.129] (helo=webmail.tiscali.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2bbE-0000ri-Vk; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from jumeira.tiscali.de (62.246.26.102) by webmail.tiscali.de (6.7.019) id 40FB899100F21F1B; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:20:42 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eclig@gmx.net In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:07:23 -0400") User-Agent: Emacs Gnus X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26705 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26705 Richard Stallman writes: [ refering to `eshell-explicit-command-char' ] > That would probable be `?\\', but `?*' is already the > default for sometime now. > It seems \ is a better default, makes the GNU system more > coherent overall. I think people will get used to the > change. Here is a patch. This change should probably be announced in the NEWS file. Something like ** The default value of `eshell-explicit-command-char' was changed to `\' to be consistent with the rest of the GNU system. 2004-09-01 Emilio C. Lopes * eshell/esh-ext.el (eshell-explicit-command-char): Changed default value to ?\\. Modified docstring accordingly. *** lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el.~1.15.~ Mon Jan 5 13:27:42 2004 --- lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el Wed Sep 1 22:06:27 2004 *************** *** 148,157 **** :type 'integer :group 'eshell-ext) ! (defcustom eshell-explicit-command-char ?* "*If this char occurs before a command name, call it externally. ! That is, although vi may be an alias, *vi will always call the ! external version. UNIX users may prefer this variable to be \." :type 'character :group 'eshell-ext) --- 148,157 ---- :type 'integer :group 'eshell-ext) ! (defcustom eshell-explicit-command-char ?\\ "*If this char occurs before a command name, call it externally. ! That is, although vi may be an alias, \\vi will always call the ! external version." :type 'character :group 'eshell-ext)