From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug bugs Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <00aa01c951a0$4535a2d0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231962621 8928 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2009 19:50:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 14 20:51:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNBlp-0001VD-2f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:51:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNBkY-0006Ey-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNBcG-0002CK-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNBcF-0002BJ-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56222 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNBcE-0002B9-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:41:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50154) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNBcE-0006g1-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:41:26 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LNBau-0007Bw-2C; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:04 -0500 X-Spook: Leuken-Baden offensive information warfare Project X-Ran: Ct%{SCXOs'w5/!E>p.4t[fw.:W*+k!\xQE2LR#J7Cu\d-Z%8[;uZ{rl*y]"~)v.bjWf+o* X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:12:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107859 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > So where do humans have chance of talking about bugs? That's somewhat off my topic. I simply want to assure you that the the _only_ reason to send mail to bug-gnu-emacs or emacs-pretest-bug is to create a new bug in the tracker. It's been that way for months and months. Those addresses should never be appearing in replies. At best, it creates pointless duplicate mails; at worst it creates new, separate bug reports that need to be tidied up.