From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enhanced select-safe-coding-system Date: 08 May 2002 23:17:09 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205010714.g417Eq607434@aztec.santafe.edu> <200205031327.g43DR1014311@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200205052324.g45NOd729789@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020896304 9089 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 22:18:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 22:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stefan Monnier" , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175ZlQ-0002MT-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2002 00:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 175Ztk-0008NM-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2002 00:27:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175ZlH-0001UA-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 18:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk ([148.79.112.146]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175ZkL-0001SZ-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 18:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fx by djlvig.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 175ZkE-0001bf-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 23:17:10 +0100 Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: <200205052324.g45NOd729789@rum.cs.yale.edu> Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3754 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3754 "Stefan Monnier" writes: > You might be right that the elisp code is fast enough, but my > patch (attached) makes fewer changes and avoids re-implementing > the same functionality in elisp. I'm afraid I can't see how that works out of context, and I'm not sure it's the right thing to do. Make sure handa approves if he hasn't done already.