From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:06:43 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87wua28zux.fsf@zip.com.au> <200311190528.hAJ5SrK02553@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3FBBD155.2050703@yahoo.com> <200311192238.hAJMcTM06424@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3FBD2533.6090503@yahoo.com> <200311270014.hAR0E0i02821@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311271611.hARGBhP04028@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311291445.hATEjN408572@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311291828.hATISht08904@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070197686 31305 80.91.224.253 (30 Nov 2003 13:08:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 30 14:08:03 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQRIx-0004od-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:08:03 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQRIx-0002Fp-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:08:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQSFw-00057j-2X for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AQSFn-00052B-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:08:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AQSFG-0003wJ-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.225.40.227] (helo=sheridan.dina.kvl.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQSF7-0003ua-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (Postfix, from userid 304) id B81AA13CED; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:06:43 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: <200311291828.hATISht08904@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:28:43 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18218 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18218 Luc Teirlinck writes: > But, first of all, do we want to do (1) or (2)? I'd vote (0): if there is no group specified, don't put it in any group. The option may very well end up in a group anyway (explicit call to custom-add-to-group or the second argument to defgroup), but if it doesn't don't worry about it. Having options that aren't in any group doesn't break anything, and we have already spend way to much energy on this non-problem.