From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:06:33 +0100 Organization: The Church of Emacs Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87wua28zux.fsf@zip.com.au> <200311190418.hAJ4ITC02466@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311190528.hAJ5SrK02553@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3FBBD155.2050703@yahoo.com> <200311192238.hAJMcTM06424@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3FBD2533.6090503@yahoo.com> <200311270014.hAR0E0i02821@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311271611.hARGBhP04028@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070297426 20347 80.91.224.253 (1 Dec 2003 16:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 01 17:50:24 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQrFg-0006xa-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:50:24 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQrFg-0001aW-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:50:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQrqY-000611-Op for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:28:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AQn6r-0006vu-Ez for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AQn4z-0006fl-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [130.225.40.227] (helo=sheridan.dina.kvl.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQmqN-0004wh-J2; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (Postfix, from userid 304) id 61CD013CE9; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:06:33 +0100 (CET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Face: +kRV2]2q}lixHkE{U)mY#+6]{AH=yN~S9@IFiOa@X6?GM|8MBp/ In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:44:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18245 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18245 Richard Stallman writes: > But shouldn't every defcustom be part of some meaningful group? > It seems to me that they all should. Depends on the value of "should". It is closer to "ought" than to "must". I'd say having one (or more) well chosen ":group"s is at the same level of importance as following the conventions for doc strings.