From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17330: files.el cd-absolute overcome false negative from file-executable-p Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 00:15:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83r449zf3s.fsf@gnu.org> <92953814-A584-41C4-940A-E58514E423AB@bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399413882 27584 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2014 22:04:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17330@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Hodges Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 07 00:04:36 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WhnR3-0002FQ-BM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 00:02:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWnV-00024T-T9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWnS-00024D-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWnS-0004WZ-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWnS-0004WV-3m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWnR-0005gX-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <41559D99-B080-4B34-B491-3A811FA9FEAE@bluewin.ch> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 04:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17330 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17330-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17330.139934973321806 (code B ref 17330); Tue, 06 May 2014 04:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17330) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2014 04:15:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWmz-0005fe-9a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:43369 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWmw-0005fU-Mv for 17330@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhWmu-0005Ac-Vs; Tue, 06 May 2014 00:15:29 -0400 X-Spook: Iran investigation 64 Vauxhall Cross Belknap dictionary X-Ran: +x7]o}LKi\=NJC)O4go`tE_/W@-MetG"l&1=EFSOA"^%@4>A~g-6hW2Hw"w{!}EKfU9EH? X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88669 Archived-At: I would *still* like to hear if file-accessible-directory-p does any better than file-executable-p. The result is only interesting in an Emacs later than 24.3. Eg 24.3.90 pretest, or current trunk or emacs-24 branch. (Since we have no recipe to reproduce this problem, no-one else can say.)