From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:19:56 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <84r87ulpts.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <20030422123301.GA26968@gnu.org> <84lly2lity.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <20030422150920.GA7693@gnu.org> <84n0iijz8u.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <848yu2tmc4.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051100836 13112 80.91.224.249 (23 Apr 2003 12:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 14:27:09 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 198JLB-0003Oq-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 198JQu-0002my-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:33:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198JJ7-00088N-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198JHB-0006OM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198JH7-0006KV-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198JFp-0005fQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 198JEX-0002tU-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:20:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 198JDa-0002oa-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:19:18 +0200 Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IjapV09A1hXXd67X91mxxFoevF4= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13389 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13389 kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes: > David Abrahams writes: > >> Believe it or not, I'm familiar with good bug reporting practice. The >> problem is that I don't know whether anyone's interested in looking at >> it and I feel that I can't give much detail about the problem. I can >> say that it's been reproduced by others, though. > > Hm. Could you go down a bit to a lower level? For example, Gnus > invokes nnimap on IMAP groups, which in turn invokes imap.el to do > the actual network communication. > > Maybe you can devise a sequence of function calls from imap.el that > show the slowness? That's a bit beyond me. To really see it in a conclusive way, you need to download a message with a large attachment. > Are you talking SSL with your IMAP server? Yes indeed. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com