From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zkkzfiz5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762nnujk8.fsf@gmx.de> <87r56953jk.fsf@gmx.de> <87boxced1c.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309645559 21278 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 22:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 22:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 00:25:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8dM-0005x6-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 00:25:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49819 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8dL-0007gm-Px for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8d7-0007ge-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8d7-00045G-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8d7-00045C-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58366) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd8d6-000722-1Y; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:25:36 -0400 X-Spook: Peking advisors Ermes EuroFed Project Monarch Juiliett X-Ran: M>m4jYYqqKW;>d@r>^OjD/KgD"kojGWwM"H72kGyff9],0@X^iGtH75Z.PxJ3gaAzG.{|F X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:19:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141468 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I think 500 is way too low. Fetching 500 bugs (via Emacs) takes about > the same time as displaying one reload of the debbugs web page. It's not that inconvenient to looks at 500 reports at a time is it? This gives you just over 3 pages to look at, for the current open normal bugs, after ~ 3 years of tracking bugs. > And I suspect that will be accessed 1000x more often than the Emacs > interface (by web bots :-), robots.txt forbids them. :) > so the limit from the Emacs interface should be at least 2K. Fetching 500 bugs uses ~ 10% of the real memory on the server. Maybe I'm overly cautious, but that seems about the right limit to me. The machine doesn't have much memory, and a lot is used up running spamassassin, mailman, etc.