From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Chen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo in compilation mode Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:50:44 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: quarl+dated+1093790992.04357d@nospam.quarl.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093359122 4770 80.91.224.253 (24 Aug 2004 14:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 24 16:51:44 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BzceF-0006zS-00 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:51:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bzcil-0001x4-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:56:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BzciA-0001oF-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bzci8-0001mo-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bzci7-0001mA-PY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzcdR-0005Wx-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BzcdP-0003yW-00 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:50:51 +0200 Original-Received: from hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu ([128.32.47.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:50:51 +0200 Original-Received: from quarl by hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:50:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu X-Quack-Archive: 1 Gmane-From: 1 User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YZwruvUNwGAC4puVE8hqjWlIyzw= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26442 >>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan writes: Stefan> I think the OP's problem has more to do with Stefan> writability than with the undo facility. Many people Stefan> expect the *compile* buffer to be read-only. Yes, read-only would be better (also prevents user from undoing) -- Karl 2004-08-24 07:49