From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Lillibridge Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5042: 23.1; linum-mode gives incorrect line numbers with narrowed buffers Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:01:51 -0800 Message-ID: References: <200911260039.nAQ0dTD1019384@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <200912100534.nBA5YSva008256@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <200912210659.nBL6xhDG020940@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001070538.o075cpux020583@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001100132.o0A1WIxG005631@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001162208.o0GM8Apr008065@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001232328.o0NNSL55029058@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <551D8700C30C4A80B2C9D4B11CAD32C9@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265174865 22548 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2010 05:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, markus.triska@gmx.at, 5042@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 06:27:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXm4-0001Q2-RF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:27:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcXm4-0007mF-BD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NcXm0-0007lK-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47705 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcXm0-0007l5-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXly-0008Dt-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39592) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXly-0008Dl-II for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:27:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXOI-0000Fb-Gh; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Lillibridge Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5042 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5042.1265173329943 (code B ref 5042); Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2010 05:02:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXNR-0000FA-4X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: from gundega.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcXNL-0000Eo-8p for 5042@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com [15.25.115.25]) by gundega.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id o1351roQ012365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:01:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ts-rhel4.hpl.hp.com (ts-rhel4.hpl.hp.com [15.25.118.24]) by mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id o1351pxg020181; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:01:51 -0800 In-reply-to: <551D8700C30C4A80B2C9D4B11CAD32C9@us.oracle.com> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:07:04 -0800) X-MailScanner-ID: o1351roQ012365 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: mark.lillibridge@hp.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:03:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34878 Archived-At: > > What do people think? > > I think that the proper place to propose and discuss a potential Emacs > enhancement is emacs-devel@gnu.org, not in a specific (though relevant) bug > thread. > > There is no reason to manage this in the bug tracker, and no reason not to > manage (and archive) it in the normal discussion list. > > Just one opinion. Good point. I will move the discussion there. - Mark