From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Lillibridge Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9831: Your bug report re: o and c-o in RMAIL change buffer Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <9452-Sat22Oct2011120849+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Reply-To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319685026 5207 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 03:10:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9831@debbugs.gnu.org To: jpff@codemist.co.uk Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 05:10:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGMI-0002dF-4d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:10:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44272 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGMH-0004vF-H3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37743) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGME-0004v1-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGMC-00087j-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:10:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGMC-00087f-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGNu-0008Sy-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <9452-Sat22Oct2011120849+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Resent-From: Mark Lillibridge Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9831.131968508132497 (code B ref 9831); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2011 03:11:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGNE-0008S6-N9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from gundega.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJGNB-0008Rx-Pi for 9831@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:11:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com [15.25.115.25]) by gundega.hpl.hp.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id p9R394Tg008130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:05 -0700 Original-Received: from ts-rhel5 (ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com [15.25.118.27]) by mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id p9R392ZL010730; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:02 -0700 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 15.0.48.190 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53186 Archived-At: Hi John. You reported an Rmail bug October 22: When reading mail o writes the message to another file, or buffer if it is loaded. It also changes to that buffer and this seriously interferes with work flow, as it is inconsistent with when the file is not in a buffer. This seems fairly recent behaviour and is causing significant problems. Could it stay in the originating buffer, or have an option so to do? We think we have a patch for your bug. Could you please try the following: * first, figure out again how to reproduce the problem you are seeing * evaluate the following elisp code: (defun rmail-summary (&rest no-display) "Display a summary of all messages, one line per message. If no-display is set, updates/creates the summary buffer, but does not necessarily display it." (interactive) (rmail-new-summary "All" '(rmail-summary t) nil) (unless (or no-display (get-buffer-window rmail-buffer)) (rmail-summary-beginning-of-message))) [just put mark and point around the above text then do M-x eval-region] * is the problem gone now? If that didn't work, can you please provide a more detailed description of the problem you are seeing, including how to reproduce it? - Thanks, Mark