From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Lillibridge Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7743: closed (Re: bug#7743: unrmail loses extra blank line at end of message) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:06:05 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8dobw38egq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322287591 4925 80.91.229.12 (26 Nov 2011 06:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:06:31 +0000 (UTC) To: <7743@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 26 07:06:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBP9-0002bx-3E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 07:06:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59279 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBP8-0003bl-As for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBP5-0003be-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:06:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBP3-0003Ir-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBP3-0003Ij-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:06:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBQf-0007Ie-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Lillibridge Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 7743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7743.132228767428047 (code B ref 7743); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2011 06:07:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBQX-0007IK-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:07:53 -0500 Original-Received: from gundega.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUBQV-0007IC-9A for 7743@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com [15.25.115.25]) by gundega.hpl.hp.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id pAQ668TI022711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:06:08 -0800 Original-Received: from ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com (ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com [15.25.118.27]) by mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id pAQ666Ed009147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:06:06 -0800 Original-Received: from ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAQ666jq018043; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:06:06 -0800 Original-Received: (from mdl@localhost) by ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id pAQ665fK018042; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:06:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ts-rhel5.hpl.hp.com: mdl set sender to mark.lillibridge@hp.com using -f In-Reply-To: (message from GNU bug Tracking System on Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:52:02 +0000) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 15.0.48.190 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:08:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54330 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Mark Lillibridge wrote: > > >> So I cannot see that blank lines are going missing (unless going from > >> Babyl to mbox adds one, and going the other way subtracts one?). > > > > You got it! Examine the BABYL file and you will see that Rmail 22.3 > > has added an extra blank line after each of your messages. That was a > > recent (pre transformation to 23) RMAIL bug, I believe. My older email > > does not have these extra blank lines. > > It sort of makes me wonder if it is worth changing this now, because if > most BABYL files started life as mbox files but were converted by Emacs, > then they have an extra blank line. The adding an extra line on incorporation is a recent bug; my older BABYL files don't have the extra blank lines. - Mark