From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13965: info.info conflict between emacs and texinfo Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:12:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <201304012234.r31MYN0N023983@freefriends.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364919197 9920 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2013 16:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13965@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-texinfo@gnu.org To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 18:13:44 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3qA-0007bA-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:13:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3pl-0006yS-OZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3pf-0006po-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3pZ-00051x-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3pZ-00051d-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3sQ-0004q2-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:16:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13965 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13965-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13965.136491935918589 (code B ref 13965); Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13965) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2013 16:15:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3sL-0004pk-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3sI-0004pa-1u for 13965@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN3pM-0003Zu-Jh; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:12:52 -0400 X-Spook: SDI assassination Etacs electronic surveillance data X-Ran: -C)_[Xs/~*;]IZy]"V:@-LH0{BN;_uUaUbNez\lk%"/K3Hu@C<&L4Fsj@L*=:&p\I%zPY1 X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <201304012234.r31MYN0N023983@freefriends.org> (Karl Berry's message of "Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:34:23 GMT") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73091 Archived-At: Karl Berry wrote: > +@include doclicense.texi > > How about naming the file fdl.texi, like virtually every other package does? If it really helps you, we could rename it. We'll have to change 58 files, several of which also live in other repositories. It won't make any difference to this issue (I assume), because it is info.info that is the problem, not info.texi. So I think you could just live with that difference. And in any case, trying to make the Texinfo and Emacs info.infos literally identical is never going to work IMO. We can never be sure that the installed versions of Texinfo and Emacs are going to match. My suggestion is that you and Emacs do nothing, and leave the people packaging Texinfo and Emacs to sort this out.