From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4526: 23.1; shadowfile always fails Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:16:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pr9fit2i.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316366235 21018 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2011 17:17:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bill Pemberton , Chong Yidong , 4526@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 19:17:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KzO-0002jp-5b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:17:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44601 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KzN-0001BB-NH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KzK-0001Au-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KzJ-0003k8-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KzJ-0003k4-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5L45-0001e8-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4526.13163664666257 (code B ref 4526); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2011 17:21:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5L3B-0001cr-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5L39-0001ck-6y for 4526@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5KyK-0006mT-Rp; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:16:04 -0400 X-Spook: cryptanalysis high security sweep MD5 asset doctrine X-Ran: x7]sA)Oa_2FP,u|prhg1+t"?|fHUa3~U-Cy|l`IOOkMKmlb_`bVaS2ACvgPSq,cDm!gg%7 X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:30:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:22:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51424 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > More information was requested more than a year ago, but was apparently > not given, so I'm closing this bug report. If the bug still exists, > please reopen the report. I seem to recall understanding this at the time, which is why I removed the moreinfo tag. So I will reopen this. (I _think_ it was that shadowfile.el does not understand tramp; see #4846 with which I merged it.)