From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard G Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: code completion Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47D69250.6050902@telenet.be> <871w6g87s9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205371264 21838 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 01:21:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard G Riley , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Bastien Guerry Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 02:21:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZc8R-000115-25 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:21:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZc7s-0000ru-3E for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZQ6O-0002Eu-UB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZQ6M-0002EN-Ei for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZQ6M-0002EK-93 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZQ6L-0002iD-W8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1082522nfh.26 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:from; bh=wfzzGbyo2NZwVE74zgzYp6cUvTRhyB9o6WCbUYheBKo=; b=ZBJ2XNg+70qqp72h3OcEmvyEPXxkfXdIo2XEkd3k2myouV4dzyE7W/wBfOg23m2ZG7PM69i5xFFcW1/XXDGdNJFdySXo3AhEG+arYfpvZfIwsli0aOal0F1ZMB5MkKiILthDROdUIFnlkwfoRrftqfWZ9MbWl62e18xwB28jSs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:from; b=FD1DmoJqyTHYAkXJzzty7putsHSLiu5H5eE4gAzuxiqIT4smUJrKUgWYXJhcyqgfEChM06r2Zi9Fb3Hc4uF32NnPu/Oovf0Cm3lg24HBEYqv0jxApsgomEwo0d5gY+gjXRtEaaTwik85D3VG4Fmq6TysVeMKcB1w/5s5OOCdieQ= Original-Received: by 10.78.149.15 with SMTP id w15mr21052788hud.45.1205325031929; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ( [85.179.193.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm4193086mue.2.2008.03.12.05.30.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871w6g87s9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:07:50 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:17:28 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:52343 Archived-At: Bastien Guerry writes: > Richard G Riley writes: > >> Last night a I spent a few hours downloading and installing and >> configuring the latest cedet. After setting up project paths, c-paths >> and turning on the semantic idle completion scheduler it works >> reasonably well for C. Only things that did not complete were fields >> protected by guard flags (to be expected), structs represented by >> typedefs and structs defined in the c file as opposed to an h file - I'm >> not sure if by design or not - but this is quite a subset. > > I guess the OP will find this useful. It is nice to have your approval Bastien.