From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7148: 24.0.50; fails to compile packages flim and lookup Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:33:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ocbcwv98.fsf@shi.workgroup> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286048506 20605 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2010 19:41:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rfrancoise@debian.org, 7148@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregor Zattler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 21:41:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P27xo-00088r-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:41:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P27xn-0002zo-L1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:41:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55834 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P27xf-0002yl-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P27xe-0002at-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P27xe-0002al-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P27nS-0004HI-3z; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7148 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7148-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7148.128604781816435 (code B ref 7148); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2010 19:30:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P27mk-0004H2-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:30:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P27mh-0004Gx-PH for 7148@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P27pd-0005Wy-2b; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:33:17 -0400 X-Spook: eavesdropping Albania investigation Khaddafi IRA Blowpipe X-Ran: -hnLGLy[Go5xHu;-Wm([co"MVWsM1#{r'xz\\=x()<19.mK]C_,|iF&3.*8`^P1\dpXW)& X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87ocbcwv98.fsf@shi.workgroup> (Gregor Zattler's message of "Sat\, 02 Oct 2010 15\:59\:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:31:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40645 Archived-At: Gregor Zattler wrote: > I have no clue what's the problem here. Is this related to > bug #6490 ? It's the same issue. Is anyone reporting this to the maintainers of these Debian packages? They need to update their code.