From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7842: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug 7842) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:41:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8739owi45n.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87zjzfpx5j.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360276933 20175 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2013 22:42:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7842@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jameson Graef Rollins Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 23:42:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAl-0006vP-Rk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:42:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43789 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAS-0004Y4-Th for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAO-0004X1-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAM-0004Ln-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAM-0004Lj-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAL-0001xP-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 7842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7842.13602769177513 (code B ref 7842); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2013 22:41:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAG-0001x4-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:41:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50619) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAE-0001wx-6S for 7842@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3aAD-0004q5-Ij; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:41:53 -0500 X-Spook: JPL Delta Force Bruxelles counter intelligence freedom X-Ran: f&nUck^I/KLe^W?Vdh?2H8R]K0&Pa:D&M\.nl\g~D,&/cf91\R\AHh9Cw(,d^w:]vaR}!* X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87zjzfpx5j.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> (Jameson Graef Rollins's message of "Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:38:32 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70855 Archived-At: Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Hi. Can you please explain why this is being closed "won't fix"? Is > there good reason for that? For the documented reason I gave in http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7842#8 There are very few things that the Elisp manual explicitly says are too difficult to implement.