From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0.91 pretest Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:26:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87tz6i6kug.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235629885 10343 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2009 06:31:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 26 07:32:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LcZnT-00012e-Up for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:32:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44301 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LcZm9-0001R2-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LcZjq-0008Iz-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:28:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LcZjn-0008H7-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:28:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54593 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LcZjn-0008Gu-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:28:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54475) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcZjn-0003Bc-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:28:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LcZhZ-00039k-3O; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:26:33 -0500 X-Spook: Attorney General Lexis-Nexis Dick Cheney Commecen Peking X-Ran: k^X9e]Er/66uHUk"Xg@_$fHJ8u_Xbtr(W\o}Z<@XF&;.lLz,BK%&/a)&iTi"f7"5*V*l}f X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:12 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109339 Archived-At: Miles Bader wrote: > I've no idea whether 2.61 is particularly any safer than 2.63 -- the > version used in the dev tree seems kinda random... AFAIK it's always been 2.61, with or without the Debian patch that fixes this mktime issue, as discussed last July. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-07/msg00581.html