From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is rst.el included in Emacs 23.1.1 or not? Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bpdv765k.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270647744 6220 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2010 13:42:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 07 15:42:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzVWQ-00024k-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:42:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzVWP-0002at-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzVWL-0002aI-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34433 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzVWJ-0002Zs-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzVWD-0007wA-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f212.google.com ([209.85.220.212]:49931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzVWC-0007w1-Vj; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1076884fxm.26 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GoLwinKnEqJLW++VBzkEmUvlgLlmZNqVplAu2R6CaHk=; b=Pr1WvJThyEB/cjW0H/VMo8kEq2gG0iiN4E4Ei90xu1gYYcLVfbNSZTWkqaE3IjMj6T H9BnHcfyxtrkHv4wi/x7AeAD83TnzvuBaJ3S8l4zYvjGIOpfNE27PO2CdDc8xyBJ3Xgy EfEPEdbp7lB7zSzHkX+F+YTU4O0TT6DpspA9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iXbSI8TKZANenLz5gnKgMbCwL+jF//DTmcYG94ZFjDpIg1p4TkvirIrYf13rNSXgTx r7CTTdo/AEm8D3tSv0pgxw8dUssh7gxQDlFNdCY/qcn4g2PQIAhqRq4j5vyAYxVfTQpi iOo4DRuRS7PP0yQX6Tkw5Q4FvspZFDB/xQTxE= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 06:41:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bpdv765k.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> Original-Received: by 10.239.137.11 with SMTP id j11mr738249hbj.177.1270647727549; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:42:07 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123312 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> Martin Soto says in the bug report below that rst.el is not included >> in his Emacs 23.1.1 copy from Ubuntu Lucid Beta. His Emacs reports >> this: >> >> =C2=A0 GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0) of 2010= -03-29 on >> =C2=A0 rothera, modified by Debian > > Ubuntu distributes the .el files in a separate package: emacs23-el > (gzipped, so actually it is rst.el.gz) > > $ dpkg --search rst.el > emacs23-el: /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/textmodes/rst.el.gz > emacs23-common: /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/textmodes/rst.elc Thanks, I was not sure about that. Martin reported that an old rst.el from DocUtils was shadowing the new in Emacs. He has sent a bug report about this.