From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17382: 24.3.90; Ediff mode is broken Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 13:14:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399050916 16695 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2014 17:15:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 17:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17382@debbugs.gnu.org To: Rafal Kowalski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 02 19:15:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH3D-0008D0-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 19:15:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH3D-0006lw-Ay for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH3A-0006kz-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH39-0007cV-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH39-0007cL-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH38-0002C2-Gn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17382 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17382-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17382.13990508498311 (code B ref 17382); Fri, 02 May 2014 17:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17382) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2014 17:14:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH2G-00029y-QW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52286 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH2E-00029p-6G for 17382@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgH2C-0002eO-BR; Fri, 02 May 2014 13:14:04 -0400 X-Spook: event security cybercash Janet Reno Peking lock picking X-Ran: IxooEu+h)#`+Ne!nK)e0|4CNRKfuEF.o}tpn+u!yuf{q9fN!P2z1$TLWt~y3+ZR'QE9R]A X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Rafal Kowalski's message of "Fri, 02 May 2014 15:45:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88533 Archived-At: Rafal Kowalski wrote: > Yes, I can reproduce it from `emacs -Q'. Here is the content of the bug > report copied out from Emacs so I am not going to open another bug > report? BTW, is there a better way to follow up on an existing bug > report? The right thing is simply to "reply to all". In particular, keep the debbugs address cc'd. Anyway, your problem is already fixed in the Emacs sources, and so should be fixed in the next pretest.