From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18716: 24.3; dired-omit-extensions's default value omits COPYING.LIB Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:54:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8761fm903w.fsf@sc3d.org> <87siip8313.fsf@igel.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413413718 17345 80.91.229.3 (15 Oct 2014 22:55:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18716@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , Reuben Thomas To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 00:55:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTJ-0007Ow-6A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:55:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTI-0002je-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTD-0002hK-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTC-0003rh-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTC-0003q3-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXTB-0005Od-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18716 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18716-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18716.141341366920696 (code B ref 18716); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18716) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2014 22:54:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXSf-0005Nk-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXSc-0005Nb-Ne for 18716@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XeXSb-0002cl-H6; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:54:25 -0400 X-Spook: BLU-97 A/B FSF cypherpunk USDOJ LLNL Fortezza Ceridian X-Ran: 6iUE$_Tmq9Lc+VEUUoK\$&[ypo!]fk|f`^lZXITbWc&cUxq'8^!uxmcr#rwt("OKkkBF"h X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:44:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94566 Stefan Monnier wrote: > If your package is distributed under 2 different licenses, then you'll > either have to put both licenses in the same file or use two different > file names, but I see no reason why those two file names have to be > "COPYING" and "COPYING.LIB". You are arguing with the GNU coding standards, all hope is lost! ;) http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Releases.html The GNU GPL, if used, should be in a file called COPYING. If the GNU LGPL is used, it should be in a file called COPYING.LESSER. BTW, guess what they used to say instead of COPYING.LESSER... http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/gnustandards/standards.texi?root=gnustandards&r1=1.185&r2=1.186