From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11862: [PATCH 9/9] doc/lispref/intro.texi: Use passive voice Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <51e3eb5ff6ec469b84839dcede4eb072-mfwitten@gmail.com> <87bojuxq1l.fsf@nolde.home> <83txxm2mfw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341507629 15751 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2012 17:00:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11862@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman , rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 05 19:00:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPk-0006O0-DT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:00:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54258 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPj-000549-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPd-00053e-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPV-0004m0-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPV-0004lo-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpUD-0004nU-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11862 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11862-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11862.134150788818416 (code B ref 11862); Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11862) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2012 17:04:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpU0-0004mz-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38641) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpTy-0004ms-9E for 11862@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmpPC-0001n9-Lt; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:59:50 -0400 X-Spook: militia John Kerry counter intelligence Ron Brown tempest X-Ran: E`K(3cI?`Al_npd|gLV|?^qQ[V'a_XaN4\PT}{ X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83txxm2mfw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:37:55 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61622 Archived-At: >> Aside from style, the statement is inaccurate, isn't it? At least >> with "make bootstrap" the last number is always 1. I don't think the lispref needs to worry about these details. (Plain `make clean' causes the same result; it seems kind of obvious to me...).