From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: docstring: mail-signature Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:05:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <25843.59441.745398.318488@google.com> <87wmx8nhcv.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25499"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 03 17:05:47 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcofb-0006QR-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 17:05:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcofH-0003vv-IP; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcofE-0003nO-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcofB-0001Y6-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-68c3b9f83f4so232969b3a.2 for ; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1693753520; x=1694358320; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=squm0j8CN9j2EzM7cM9m+ujrS7Ndm4yWklNiCgCEPcI=; b=nvaI+Q/pMLcD/oGo1oPWVkZHrqTJTA+EU9+5n0V9+PpNN4kEDJxQ//NsCQ/W3tbk0J fDbJUjaPAZCT6TsrssTvHQIDLxZv15lL7suei0ZnwuQ3G4uvJv36MgDIUq6SPPWDRl+r 2vBDOzALWTr63AwTzRS5OLQ9EU5ByWLJ/Imf2Eux7KJd99E78Ja8Elta2tO5fKd6Ze5E DSzD0hulyklkl0L/rWeWJsIGAuKyajFJDOOkiKimxJ990QXWSh3FLt/Ni9WhZN+5UYHe GmfRbEuUgwlHnHSRO4oOTlq0id+8fCN8PT5egM1Q1Rsnftkx60J7M7rwrGM+oPk1LVAl kCHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693753520; x=1694358320; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=squm0j8CN9j2EzM7cM9m+ujrS7Ndm4yWklNiCgCEPcI=; b=LJ233ghnb9oBrb3vIW6ksEwGJJlapPe4oiyFtArOotnLInm8lIN5R9yU120HooSGdt w+ZthU2Kh/IyzzY6/m2s3MXF5YNyU+7gwwW8EekPk+FF1J1ys4MOqSn/Uky123kcT+AV t/xBgxGaJmR1+9OfDEdQ65MPrmY+H049fm0l6ikKzun41JdipJUiIH+N3vDfrfRl4sQi n8pg2X18FB6d9Bdi7+bVsZxEmT1Zt9Y8/W0OzYUR5GOajh/LmpfRVwnl2cL1npWM0hVI ciY9G2CRD51d/VbG158fsT4dqEcxCnsc+NjLH+OuYd62ZcKErqyjOMXYynP9IKS2ScrW XG5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx5l2pMWTzdq3MlJ4mG4VwbgEeVFLnzxoPsS/d8+BKlVjrxSaq2 4rdKfm1SRBIr5ImiSwg3mriqmirajzz4ey9an4OmtBDq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGnQzy8EMGIZXL149OhsLJqaultvLshCNl313sJ8shWeWTTi4kAjD3moeJii7vYU0xR/43LA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:a59d:b0:14e:509:2007 with SMTP id gd29-20020a056a21a59d00b0014e05092007mr2222386pzc.42.1693753519389; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from raman9 ([73.252.235.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16-20020a633c50000000b005701110ca06sm6132074pgn.5.2023.09.03.08.05.17 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:05:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wmx8nhcv.fsf@dataswamp.org> (Emanuel Berg's message of "Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:03:12 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::432; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pf1-x432.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309982 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg writes: That was the issue I was trying to trace down (duplicate sig) when I spotted that doc bug. > T.V Raman wrote: > >> --=20 >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) >> =E2=99=89 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE > > Something is sure up since your signature appeared twice. --=20 Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) =E2=99=89 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =F0=9F=A6=AE