From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:34:00 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqxymd3.fsf@gnu.org> <878rygj4gt.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnm0zz0q.fsf@gnu.org> <874k94j3rn.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91kzydh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh4holf.fsf@gnus.org> <822aec9d01909cecfc6c@heytings.org> <87a6iwhltf.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuh4zfg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26gfobr.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuh4f1ie.fsf@gnus.org> <878ry6b064.fsf@bernoul.li> <874k8swi4d.fsf@gnus.org> <877ddogdkr.fsf@bernoul.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb18030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17824"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Gregory Heytings , Stefan Kangas To: Jonas Bernoulli Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 19:35:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mihaC-0004Lh-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 19:35:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mihaB-0006Fj-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mihYv-0005YF-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]:43821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mihYt-0003FI-7q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id y1so8673430plk.10 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZCxjn/gtO1dAz1nCgLzf5d9yHsWuS4QcIsbUCq/ApWA=; b=ffobv1C2LgwRw5Lobb3+fU4uScFeQ5GH3bejJ3cTaayg+I5r85WPnQ9oWMNdmUB25q THVcNljCF79yCEikWEpG8VZ3tXvhfF6QtE4aPWS4Z3rZfEexysVEV2bON+1CqMhMJ5Wf VN9kFDwQImuNsdul1vMVtjHJ3+T6MTJFZX59p9rtNKMXe1bHn7euUcuuuw0Yp2rDZR83 CPwhN/0/9rF8sAysjW9rl2lzNjwDlymGZf1DR/zhd1Uf/AtZGhzchw4bVpNjO8AiZQsR tObajucjcvbcD2uJWOEdWa+VYcQzsrNbMEby4RxPgTtB5F6rAsMa0HmRD2L26L6PgkCV 4WTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZCxjn/gtO1dAz1nCgLzf5d9yHsWuS4QcIsbUCq/ApWA=; b=TB82Rgr6BnlgyT1MnPynPmDZibAhtLzT1d0F1/AzrFr90AQlfLA3H6E3fFJo5j5bAJ ZTckTvoYg47gt9bEx0ue2hef2RGcdgyM7rqZRP0yMKgimzB4aHuUO4I3c86mLHyv7yv7 VDNijEHEoiDq4V0/E/NvuSqKugwxQNANolTqKUg3vVIOlUWUZyrVlQt43fG0z5wnjksr TELOo63+96GAzEbdh7+lGsPRd4KWejq7hNziehRmmeVGY7rK2p73+hYXFR7rNrxHZ99k YdJk/PPexmpSfAHiTY3nOIKsWaeDzQV1DVm6VEDI+wzxB+IaQE2fNIbYRv4FfPHuZP7w DuhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FVXD8ZQ7mkKRhHAcViS5QQNvX0Vrd8qE/bnP3ufRd8axx2LrS RH9OGqSF9JH9R39Dwboa0Y6n5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxosiUidpULuAfAIvR7kBEI8WJ0ixUppRqLlS54DP7gF2MphUqMvLqmGmQhiseKGBmhECAEQw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b8d:: with SMTP id lr13mr24481422pjb.239.1636050842934; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from raman-glaptop (c-24-4-174-65.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.4.174.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm5670555pfv.67.2021.11.04.11.34.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877ddogdkr.fsf@bernoul.li> (Jonas Bernoulli's message of "Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:12:04 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=raman@google.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -175 X-Spam_score: -17.6 X-Spam_bar: ----------------- X-Spam_report: (-17.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278697 Archived-At: Jonas Bernoulli writes: The other "interesting bug" that becomes apparent with Emacspeak: Background: Emacspeak attaches a minibuffer setup hook that plays a sound when the minibuffer opens. It appears that each operation via transient opens the minibuffer twice -- since I hear the sound twice, rather than just once as one would expect. Might be worth debugging since it likely has a performance hit when navigating large trees. > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Jonas Bernoulli writes: >> >>> Using transient would work here but currently enabling such navigation >>> using (setq transient-enable-popup-navigation t) affects all transients. >>> A prefix slot that controls this behavior could be added of course. >> >> Hm... doesn't seem to work here -- perhaps it's because how these >> transients are constructed. That is, takes me to the first >> choice, but then nothing. > > Somewhere else I mentioned that the top group heading appears > out of order. > > I've figured that out now; this was caused by `transient--pixel-width'. > Moving save-window-excursion outside of `with-temp-buffer fixed' it. I > have also dropped the `set-window-dedicated-p', which doesn't seem to > make a difference either way. > > This change might very well fix the above issue as well. T.V and I have > also noted navigational issues (though all three of us noticed different > ones). The one I noticed is fixed by this, I expect the others are too. > --=20 Thanks, --Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research) =817=A94 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 =950=DC8