Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:


I was thinking more of manipulating DOM (Document Object Model)
structures via elisp code rther than JS> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > At the same time, having  a "web in emacs extension language" might
>   > allow us to imagine, invent, and create a whole new class of
>   > collaborative interactions
>
> That phrase is evocative, but it isn't concrete.  It could mean many
> things.  To me, it suggests the idea of a web site that people
> interact with through a particular Emacs Lisp program.  Is that what
> you mean?
>
> If a web site intends users to run some specific Emacs Lisp program,
> the way to do this and respect the users' freedom is to release
> that program like any other free software package.  That way, users
> can make and use modified versions.  Users and distros can release
> and maintain their versions, too.
>
> But I don't see that this has anything to do with the question
> of Emacs and Javascript.  Javascript plays no role in it.
>
> If you mean something else, could you describe it more clearly?

-- 
♈ Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  🦮