From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5655: incorrect paths for crt1.o, crtn.o, etc. Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:51:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100301232258.GM7587@ohnopublishing.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272138989 20966 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2010 19:56:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5655@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 24 21:56:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lSj-0003PM-Tu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:56:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5lSj-0007hJ-CS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O5lRw-0007Q4-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37629 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5lRt-0007O2-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lRr-00084m-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lRq-00084h-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lOT-0002pP-Rx; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5655.127213870110864 (code B ref 5655); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2010 19:51:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lO8-0002pB-Hl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lO7-0002p6-8o for 5655@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5lO4-0003LF-I9; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:51:36 -0400 X-Spook: SRI cracking passwd [Hello to all my friends and fans in X-Ran: -m,$~9b+PS<"(7xvCKU1 (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sat\, 24 Apr 2010 15\:26\:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:52:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36477 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > It looks like the FreeBSD code in amdx86-64.h is now the same as the > #else code. Can they be unified? Yes, I think you are right, well spotted. I did so.