From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9831: o and c-o in RMAIL change buffer Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9452-Sat22Oct2011120849+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321263162 6094 80.91.229.12 (14 Nov 2011 09:32:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9831@debbugs.gnu.org, jpff@codemist.co.uk To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 10:32:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsu4-00014J-DL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:32:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsu3-0001FN-Cv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41745) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsty-0001Eu-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPstx-0007wB-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPstx-0007w7-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsuU-0003KY-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9831.132126317412784 (code B ref 9831); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2011 09:32:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsuK-0003K4-7n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsuH-0003Js-Qn; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:50 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPsth-0002UC-MP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:32:13 -0500 X-Spook: strategic ARPA Bletchley Park weapons of mass destruction X-Ran: l[<)!nu*."\-J$+A}41*lhV9yPdWmj]o+v@Lyo(6CYC8k*0&|U~K6JD@Fn*y+?|UB9,:~_ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Mark Lillibridge's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:09:02 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:33:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53889 Archived-At: close 9831 24.0.92 stop The OP: a) hasn't replied; b) did not mention summaries at all; and c) said this was "fairly recent" behaviour; whereas the issue identified occurs since 23.1, but only when summaries are present. Nevertheless, I think you probably identified the problem, and I committed a fix. Summary: emacs -Q C-u M-x rmail RET ~/xmail RET ; non-empty folder h C-x 1 C-u M-x rmail RET ~/RMAIL RET ; non-empty folder o RET ; output message from RMAIL to xmail At this point, xmail buffers appear.