From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "William Xue" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to align the comments to start from the same column? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:03:15 +0800 Organization: wv Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184137414 10561 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2007 07:03:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 11 09:03:31 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I8WEU-00057g-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:03:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8WEU-0003QQ-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8WER-0003QL-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8WEO-0003Po-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8WEO-0003Pl-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.229]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I8WEN-0001O8-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so1157366nzc for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:from:organization:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=no3Zybxd6+44/xPAcId+IXMBlEggb3kimKHIbhIjs1dEUys+tk89yQ/dOYcxT+EnjAkXERY66KQy9ERtTotqIqMA6zEftDzjU3EszhFKrO7eaDZCv+NcxoTBcnfLgha78frO1lVxx7RZh+QaAJkR/2JmBgiranB48DvD9axIrb4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:subject:from:organization:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=jLVCHoxGWClwzvB9vNgPiKE9pJld53pxXhWyM+UR5bpPSvvIJuTeebboCmcG58Z8/OGQQEKN5YIt1uHHfm4NGRD1l+FCZJWd1TnNjPv2lXZWxjLiq/yaT9mw1Z0OkRydyb6lbxf7C8ZNwM1HlbLmys3dOqkN86Km69SWvrPHmDo= Original-Received: by 10.141.142.15 with SMTP id u15mr1526859rvn.1184137401994; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from williamnb ( [222.92.124.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l31sm14721205rvb.2007.07.11.00.03.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.21 (Win32) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74636 Archived-At: On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:01:56 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> but like the following codes: > [...] >> the '//' of MdlChain could not be a row to IoStatus's. > >> it seems M-; could not back-reference in some situation. > > I believe your example came out all wrapped, so it was not > understandable. > But I believe your complaint is that if one of the lines (let's call it > L) > can't be aligned, then the ones after L do not get aligned with the > ones before L. If so, yes, it's a limitation and I'm not sure how/if it > should be lifted. > > Got it. Thanks for your explanation. > > Stefan -- Sincerely yours, William