From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Tamas Patrovics" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: read-face-name PROMPT arg should be self-contained, including ": " Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:15:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174339411 19850 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2007 21:23:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier To: "Drew Adams" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 19 22:23:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HTPK7-0001Ow-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:23:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTPLb-0000Ji-71 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTOHl-0006w8-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:16:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTOHj-0006vf-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTOHi-0006vc-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:16:51 -0500 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HTOGE-0004Qd-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so24381nfc for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:from:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=W7KlNOmPg6nPy3uUyv+Wun8WZJqLGPdOSuYy/RwvsKLKU87bArm8PvLNgEb7aDsiOaZJWHpaktNI87zmD7PQ7rjXhxbiJBv1W1DNe4tqQJxx5iRg6nyrKdUHWQP7OyDpkNAvRT2VJl/glsvXgPvIh1Vul4SCbAvAOU1yzj1jKUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:to:subject:from:cc:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pwjW9CrkkmdiAB4tXruTXF+V0+jIw7WjVjgfdrTPtWtZ3LBG3JkyFeP7Qd/wN+XuL45u9sjg0Vk6LliWSuia/HbdzcIIU4wsYe1+8IsBINgIlZbGp5lCSTtraRX7KNK6iLZ3CS9XnwPu4WSCxfLE4XXaL+0KnG3R16FjATMeWis= Original-Received: by 10.82.163.13 with SMTP id l13mr10824266bue.1174335316557; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home-e3eee1b651 ( [81.183.146.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5sm19609729mue.2007.03.19.13.15.14; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:15:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:24:16 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68122 Archived-At: Please remove me from the followups of this thread. I didn't ask to be included it in the first place. On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:07:43 +0100, Drew Adams wrote: >> >> >> I was recently thinking that rather than adding new history vars >> >> >> everywhere all the time, we could change the history navigation >> >> >> to automatically skip entries which are not completion >> >> >> candidates (at least for those cases that are `must-match'). >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > If so, then this would still be limiting for non-`must-match', >> > IIUC. If you wanted to be able to cycle to a history entry >> > that is not in the initial set of completions, you could not. >> >> Which part of my quoted text (underlined above) did you not understand? > > I understood that. I tried to clarify that it is not "at least"; it is > _only_ for the must-match case. >