From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Andryshak Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433346436 32098 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 15:47:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Petton , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 17:47:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Ask-0005b4-Pr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:47:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Ask-0002Kj-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0AsW-0002KP-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0AsR-0000zt-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vn0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::233]:41570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0AsR-0000zU-B1; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: by vnbg7 with SMTP id g7so1625701vnb.8; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=pnGoANPqbJY9WtsHyJo5Z9Ep+2P+QGS9vxVFkSA/ICk=; b=bta8kya9hFD9XeYTGu/MDWa9J2o77mfNX/1NUgyPBz3Vu3mRuGVU2Oyo+QlhOnLemJ sTGeohA6LccVgKXfs+bHMxQD94JWL4Qkq/oWAUTaGEXri6m93edU2xtrgGK7VcMck2y0 lksg/TScJs3RvIMH/a0cwlv1mJsLrKQD2jmHXdum6zh4/ehKwyKKip0xpIMmh3ZH4at9 5czW2gdgs/cuYaBVDm31gK+Lb38rFWzVmdpGiwxD6wr2rOq/47r93XcFrMQ6PM3Tq6qZ laBKBaVoGrtIQyIMObM6ZmcOF6a11of3lWD4CbNlXI/lQQQ1cXOAMn9mvxi9+Ppm9PQ4 OSkQ== X-Received: by 10.52.148.1 with SMTP id to1mr29610102vdb.92.1433346406445; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from NAND-LT ([47.19.134.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jk10sm1166178vdb.13.2015.06.03.08.46.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:46:45 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186990 Archived-At: > What would '(string> A B)' do that '(string< B A)' doesn't? Functionally, nothing, but it seems silly to have only one without the other, don't you think? Why would a language have '<' without '>'? > With that argument, we'd also need string<= and string>=. Nothing wrong with that. - Nick