From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ndame via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50766: Regexp paren pairs in query-replace-regexp prompt should be highlighted Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:16:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1LWmgMt-iOZcz0k2N5IVTqgDu922CLEd8GATVBsqdQfVeBzIGEaVuORC9k0SXORQDkpqc8BO3zxOPFbQeMMhNHQmOvcvIOpOpoWL8CAVUq8=@protonmail.com> <87bl4jxacl.fsf@gnus.org> <877df5tqyj.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22490"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50766@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 15:44:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqvr-0005gU-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:44:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqvq-0000E5-JN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqWD-0004x4-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqWA-0002Xo-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqW9-0000hY-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ndame Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50766 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50766.16327486252610 (code B ref 50766); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2021 13:17:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqVE-0000g2-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40130.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.130]:51402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUqUy-0000f2-TS for 50766@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:17:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1632748602; bh=eOy53O9qIJ9QAzgXtlpWR7UXlTi8x/toevvZ1JV9gDs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nSZXM0mi/LsJtD8ZJnDZvEG9V2WBMW4tuPdf8XGi3vwiDJNa7Qut4489f2zujm1vL E5XF+Pleg834NhKMI4sqvZzY22c+DBJEbXv1UEEKK0/jHCTR9l3L1Xtv81prgjvHzP WHIiPn2uNO7ydBRWy//RrlCvzCZSlMjmqgRHw3Lo= In-Reply-To: <877df5tqyj.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" X-ACL-Warn: , ndame Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215663 Archived-At: > > But doesn't it already have escape syntax? That's why (...) blinks and > \(...\) doesn't blink, I'd have thought. (But I haven't tested it.) Optimally, both should blink, but only for their fitting pairs. So, \( does not match ), no blink, but it matches \), there should be a bli= nk. And vica versa for (. > The problem is, though, that we do want \ to escape some things (like > \[, which is the literal [ character), but the logic is the opposite Even the literal character can have a matching \] part for which it should blink, because it helps the user to see which literal \[ he closed. So blinking should be able to handle escaped and non-escaped parens too and pair them properly.