From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tramp with GUD broken on trunk? Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:20:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18065.63231.612402.142669@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18066.3981.316891.841594@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183980051 21883 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2007 11:20:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nick Roberts Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 09 13:20:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I7rIP-0007So-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:20:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7rIO-0007Su-Cn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I7rIK-0007RL-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:20:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I7rIG-0007O4-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:20:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7rIG-0007No-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de ([194.113.59.96]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I7rIF-0002A5-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from slbhab.alcatel.de (slbhab.bln.sel.alcatel.de [149.204.63.218]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/ICT) with ESMTP id l69BKauG025790; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:20:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <18066.3981.316891.841594@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:35:57 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (hpux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 149.204.45.73 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74497 Archived-At: Nick Roberts writes: > Sure, I was just reporting a regression that I thought might not have been > noticed. I don't understand the workings of TRAMP but if you can express what > changes are needed to gud.el, I might be able to help First of all, call-process and/or start-process must be replaced by process-file and start-file-process, respectively. Then I needed to adapt gud-find-file, gud-%s-find-file and gud-%s-massage-args. I don't remember the details (I wrote it in November 2005); you might check the code at . I fear the change is not trivial, although it might be simpler to change inside the concerned gud functions. If you could apply a patch I'ld really appreciate it because my todo list is rather long. Best regards, Michael.