From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Allen S. Rout" Subject: back matter in Org documents. Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baUda-00050y-46 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:14:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baUdV-0003rB-Ow for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:14:04 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39468 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baUdV-0003pW-Gu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:14:01 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1baUdO-0005Un-Ti for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:13:54 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I've got a document structure I'd like to use, and I've been thinking about how to do it. I thought I'd float the idea, and see if anyone has attempted something similar. I'm writing some prose, in which I'm referring to email messages. In magical rainbow-pony land, my use case would look something like ----------- Text text text blah blah relevant point, see [[ref: ./2004-01-13.eml]] blah blah more prose. ------------ A footnote/endnote signifier would be placed in the prose at the point of the ref, and the contents of the file would be included in an appendix section. I've been searching on 'appendix', and the references seem mostly to talk about _formatting_ the section we deem an appendix, in the appropriate style. I understand the value of this, but it's not my case. Should I just define a section, #+INCLUDE each email I care about, and do an internal link? That's not awful, but it's not nearly as high-speed and sexy. - Allen S. Rout