From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bugs cannot be updated if they are archived? Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:09:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <007401c95d6b$107a1590$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20081213230827.GQ24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <008501c95d7e$932b4a00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20081214003123.GU24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229217112 27682 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2008 01:11:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:11:52 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 14 02:12:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBfXU-0008FD-2g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:12:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56679 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBfWI-0000vb-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:11:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBfV1-0008Ld-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBfV0-0008JT-4D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50101 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBfUz-0008JC-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:10:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52101) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBfUz-0003rN-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:10:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBfUK-0001WX-VB; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:09:40 -0500 X-Spook: insurgency CBNRC anarchy Reno USCODE Armani lock picking X-Ran: XEu%3wjL[KBU5jB@Dn8@A,j'uw!CdH-"Njc3D2vVj&}!Vh23[H+Ey^n_eE/FnGyaYvd3rQ X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <20081214003123.GU24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> (Don Armstrong's message of "Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:31:23 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106896 Archived-At: >> However, I've also been explicitly told to open a new bug for bugs >> that have been closed but that might still present a problem - >> including for this bug, a couple of hours ago! Where is this "explicit" advice? >> Whatever. I'm all for reopening an existing bug instead of just >> creating a new pointer bug. Just tell me how. > > See the link above. This will be fun...