From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: builds are getting slower? Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8337vab7nx.fsf@gnu.org> <0d7fkmdxj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <566D0BEB.4010707@cs.ucla.edu> <52wpsif21j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <6tpoy9aorv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fuz54sfk.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1u73cz8.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh8u1u71.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2n9rjib.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453244160 22836 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2016 22:56:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 23:55:59 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBu-0000T9-R2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:55:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39568 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBu-0000rt-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBj-0000rm-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBi-00006P-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBh-00006D-Ck; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aLfBg-0005ou-Ji; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:55:44 -0500 X-Spook: fundamentalist Contamination AIEWS SHA Verisign Swine X-Ran: _(/l1W7p*>/TXz/hMh>.Lpru+]DUSq*Jwv.1R`v38J{O*?t>,+'Uu_y/_vaYDg9"sieBc2 X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198402 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba wrote: > Ok. I've pushed a change using completion instead of wildcards (the > documentation still needs to be updated). > > Could someone check whether build speeds have improved? Somewhat faster, but still much slower than it was when there could be only one dir-locals. Rough, one-off timings: wildcards was ~ 22% slower, completion seems to be ~ 18% slower.