From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12647: 24.2.50; emacs --daemon broken in tty Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:46:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20121014154458.GA14676@c3po> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350604066 32526 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2012 23:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12647@debbugs.gnu.org, Toby Cubitt To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 01:47:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzoZ-0000o9-Fq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 01:47:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34171 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzoS-00089E-3r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzoP-000886-5k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzoO-0000kd-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzoO-0000kZ-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzpm-0001Kn-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12647 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12647.13506041035032 (code B ref 12647); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2012 23:48:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzp8-0001J7-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53425 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzp7-0001Iy-5w for 12647@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOzni-0008PC-0U; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:46:54 -0400 X-Spook: FSF Arnett eavesdropping subversive Reno Abu Ghraib X-Ran: Prr;>X6&a%rmRIM,=\%:^6{MjC*^yWtFaCz*PMZ,L%_2k#MsKtt!?rI@ML(fHU2&a$y{R4 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:34:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65715 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > We agreed above that we can't afford the right fix for the > feature freeze. I was more hoping to get an answer to "why did this code change in the first place during a feature freeze"? Ie, was it really necessary for cygw32 that frame handling on all platforms be changed?