From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34776: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="170756"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, 34776@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 10:41:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8n9-000iEV-Ow for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8n8-0003vO-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8n2-0003vI-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8n1-0000NY-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8n0-0000Mx-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8mz-0003Ma-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34776.155488560412845 (code B ref 34776); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2019 08:40:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8m4-0003L7-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60428 helo=mx1.suse.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8m1-0003KV-9A for 34776@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:40:02 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA4FB168; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:39:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: I can see you GUYS an' GALS need a LOT of HELP...You're all very STUPID!! I used to be STUPID, too..before I started watching UHF-TV!! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:22:44 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157455 Archived-At: On Apr 10 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On April 10, 2019 11:05:02 AM GMT+03:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Apr 10 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, since within an hour of RC >> release a new commit was pushed to the release branch, and another one >> a week later, without asking. So now the RC tarball will not be able >> to be renamed anyway, and the rationale for withholding doc changes is >> null and void. >> >> Why not? Just tag the last commit that is contained in the rc >> release. >> >> Andreas. > > The RC contains several uncommitted changes. Hopefully won't happen in the future. That isn't a problem either. They can be put on a local branch, into which upstream is merged after the tag. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."