From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `make emacs' recompiles? Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:08:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384333730 6901 80.91.229.3 (13 Nov 2013 09:08:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 13 10:08:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VgWRQ-0006dV-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:08:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgWRP-0004LK-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:08:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgWRH-0004Dk-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgWRC-0003HT-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:08:43 -0500 Original-Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41226 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgWRC-0003HL-0Q; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095B9A7994; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:08:37 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: This is a NO-FRILLS flight -- hold th' CANADIAN BACON!! In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:00:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165226 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I cannot tell now. However, the clock on this machine is only about 4 minutes > away from correct. Anyway, the source file times were generated on my machine > when I ran bzr, and I don't see how there can be clock skew within one > machine if you don't change the clock setting. There can still be time stamps in the future, given how bad your clock was. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."