From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22614: 25.1.50; ../../emacs/lisp/net/eww.el:29:1:Error: =?UTF-8?Q?Symbol=E2=80=99s?= value as variable is void: image-map Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <868u2s1ydw.fsf@boetes.org> <85lh6so6p5.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <87pow3oqgy.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455184827 21265 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2016 10:00:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wjenkner@inode.at, 22614@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 11:00:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2n-00073G-0a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:00:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48182 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2m-0007gs-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 05:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2i-0007eh-TJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 05:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2d-0000PN-At for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 05:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2d-0000P7-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 05:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2c-0008Ik-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 05:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22614 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22614-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22614.145518478231853 (code B ref 22614); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22614) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2016 09:59:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2F-0008He-9o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTo2A-0008HS-CK for 22614@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:59:37 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E912ABB4; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:59:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: I just had a MAJOR CONTRACT DISPUTE with SUZANNE SOMERS!! In-Reply-To: <87pow3oqgy.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:50:21 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112886 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > >> This (ie, defining something from image.el in shr.el just to stop a void >> variable error) seems sub-optimal to me. Can't shr use something like >> "(when (featurep 'image) ...)" instead? > > Yeah, I think that's a better idea. I'll make the change. That changes the behaviour depending on the load order of shr vs. image. Why doesn't shr require image? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."