From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:16:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sgooroa4.fsf@gnus.org> <83k19zpwtx.fsf@gnu.org> <8736gnb8mk.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="187978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37485@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 14:17:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNHG-000mmq-CN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:17:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNHF-0006JE-3o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNH6-0006Iv-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNH4-0001RJ-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNH4-0001RC-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNH4-0000BW-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37485 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37485-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37485.156924099431825 (code B ref 37485); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37485) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 12:16:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNGc-0008H2-5g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42628 helo=mx1.suse.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCNGZ-0008B0-Ur for 37485@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:16:32 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2027BAF43; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:16:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: Yow! I forgot my PAIL!! In-Reply-To: <8736gnb8mk.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:38:11 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166991 Archived-At: On Sep 23 2019, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> C-c RET b mml-attach-buffer >>> C-c RET c Prefix Command >>> >>> I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that >>> when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever >>> wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'. >> >> It's a key you press, so I think it's a Good Thing that we use RET >> here. > > I'm not sure I understand... > > Both RET and C-m are keys we press, but the intended (both mnemonic and > ergonomic) key stroke here is `C-c C-m c' (etc) and not the awkward `C-c > RET c'. C-m and RET are one and the same. You are probably confusing it with . Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."